BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer

BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer

BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer

BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer

BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer

 

Battle of the Forms
Nellie Nimble, purchasing manager for Fast Color Paint Company, mailed a purchase order to AB Can Corporation for 100,000 cans of high-gloss white paint at $15 per gallon wholesale. The order form mailed by Nellie contained 17 printed conditions on its reverse side. The third condition stated: “Buyer may reject any defective goods within 30 days of delivery.”
The order form also stated that payment would be made as follows: 50% upon receipt of the goods, and 50% within 30 days of the receipt of goods. AB Can (the seller) sent a signed letter confirming the order, but the letter stated: “Any objection to goods shipped must be in writing within five (5) days of receipt of goods.” AB Can’s letter specified the same payment schedule as Fast Color’s purchase order, but stated, in addition, “Interest at the rate of 12% per year will be charged on late payments.” Fast Color’s purchase order said nothing about interest on late payments.
AB Can delivered the cans (100,000) and Fast Color sought to object to 10,000 of the cans as defective on the seventh day after receipt of the cans. Fast Color paid 50% of the order’s purchase price upon delivery but paid the balance (minus the 10,000 cans it rejected) 40 days after delivery. Did Fast Color have the right to reject 10,000 cans, seven days after delivery? Does Fast Color owe interest on the portion of its payment that was not paid within 30 days of receipt of the paint order? Did the provision for interest on late payments materially alter the contract? What terms in AB Can’s purchase confirmation are additional terms, not mentioned at all in Fast Color’s order? (Explain your rationale, and also state whether you believe the outcome is fair.)
Students, we spent two weeks discussing common law contracts based on the “mirror image” rule and the elements of offer, acceptance, and consideration. Now, we learn about UCC contracts.
Please read the Battle of the Forms presentation in the Lecture tab BEFORE posting to this TDA as the rules for these types of contracts are different!
Let’s start by discussing what you learned in the Battle of the Forms presentation: what elements are necessary for a UCC contract to be formed?

 

For getting the instant download solution, Please click on the “PURCHASE” link below to get “BUSN 420 Business Law Week 5 Battle of the Forms Discussion Question 1_Answer”.

For instant digital download of the above solution or tutorial, please click on the below link and make an instant purchase. You will be guided to the PAYPAL Standard payment page wherein you can pay and you will receive an email immediately with a download link. Please note that in case of technical glitch, the solutions will be emailed to you within 24 hours.

In case you find any problem in getting the download link or downloading the tutorial, please send us an email on mail@edusolutionguide.com